Baseball Strike Essay Research Paper GAME OVER

Baseball Strike Essay, Research Paper

GAME OVER!

“I don’t like it. People won’t be able to come to these games anymore, and I don’t like that”. A sad nine –

year – old fan voices his concerns on the 1994 major League Baseball strike. The `94 baseball season has

come to an abrupt end. Players have ceased play because they feel they are being treated unfairly with the

owner’s plan to impose a salary cap. Owners are finding it difficult to come to terms with their own

disagreements. Small market teams are rising to power with their demands while large market team owners

are finding it hard to deal with the teams and their issues, while still trying to please the players. In essence,

it is a three – way battle between the two sides of large and small market owners and the players. Neither

side is showing any sort of sympathy for the other side. They are sticking with their proposals without any

thoughts of changing them. Confusion is setting in on both sides. They are finding it hard to lean toward a

goal when they do not know what they want. The baseball strike involves greed, uncertainty, and lack of

desire to resolve the issue on both sides. While confusion mounts among owners and persistence rides high

among players, things are only going to get worse until they come to some sort of an agreement.

The baseball strike of `94 officially hit the hearts of America on August 12, three quarters into one of the

most intriguing seasons in a long time. A season on the verge of breaking many long standing records. As

the strike began, the people of the world looked with sadness, as well as disgust towards players and

owners. Officially, the strike is the players verses the owners, but at a closer look, it is much more

complicated. Within the owners meetings, there is feuding as well. Small market clubs such as Montreal,

Milwaukee, Cincinnati, and Kansas City, are addressing their needs which conflict the needs of the large

market owners. The main concern the owners have is that players salaries are eating up an increased

percentage of the owners revenues. Small market owners are now insisting that all twenty-eight ball clubs

share their income equally, not only to maintain parity in the league, but also so the smaller clubs can

survive.

Money began disappearing from baseball in 1989 when owners, found guilty of collusion, boycotted free

agent markets, and were ordered to pay players 10.5 million dollars. Then, in 1990, a huge television deal

was set that was going to accumulate more than one – billion dollars throughout major league baseball. The

TV package failed, and the owners lost all the money they were counting on. Finally, in 1992, Fay Vincent,

the commissioner of baseball at the time, tried to intervene and help out with labor negotiations, only to be

forced to resign by the owners who thought he was out of his place. Now, there is not a commissioner to

resolve any problems that baseball has. At this moment, small market teams are coming into control. Last

January, the small market owners introduced a revenue – sharing proposal by threatening the big market

teams to share radio income with the small market teams. The plan would only be set forth if players agreed

to a salary cap, which is where they are now.

The large market teams such as Los Angeles, both New York teams, and both Chicago teams, are

disregarding the smaller teams problems. They do not believe revenue should be shared among teams. They

say it’s a business. Revenue sharing would break the business. The truth is that teams with smaller revenues

cannot keep up with players salaries, while the teams who can pay them more receive the high price, high

talented players, who increase chances of winning and bring in more money. Smaller teams make a good

point in saying that a business is not always a competition. They say that this business will not prosper until

all aspects, and all job positions in the game are profiting. The only thing both sides agree on is that baseball

must have a salary cap, which would reduce team’s spending for salaries from 58 to 50 percent of baseball

revenues. This would cumulate more money to please small market teams, and more profit to make the

whole baseball industry more secure. The large market teams are proposing plans to the small market teams,

but it is not going to matter when the large market teams do not comply with small market pleas to have

revenue sharing. The small market owners promise to block any settlement that they believe does not let

them compete with wealthier teams.

“Salary cap!” Insist the owners. “NO WAY!” Reply the players. The players are not flinching on this issue.

The players chose their strike date before spring training, rather than later in the season. This allowed

owners to think their side through the season and time after the strike date to crack under the pressure of

resuming play and preserve the post season. The players realize that they have control if they play or not

w

Внимание, отключите Adblock

Вы посетили наш сайт со включенным блокировщиком рекламы!
Ссылка для скачивания станет доступной сразу после отключения Adblock!

Скачать